Stromboli writes: "They just saw him as an old man, definately not their leader, remember that only few give a shit about what he says."
Hmmm. Where did this "fact" come from? Most of the Catholics I know revere JPII and are proud that he has continued to work and be their spiritual leader, regardless of his physical limitations. JPII has shown people, by his example, the value of a life even if it's been compromised by illness. JPII is definitely their leader. That's why there are 250,000 people crowded together in St. Peter's Square right now holding a vigil as he dies.
I don't know about Italy but I know that in the U.S. 80% or more of Catholics do use contraception but they also are fully aware that JPII has reminded them that it's considered a sin in the Catholic church. The difference is, if they decide to break the rules, they don't have to go before a judicial committee.
People who contracept, etc., are called "cafeteria-style Catholics" by the faithful, meaning that they pick and choose what beliefs of the Church they want to accept for themselves and what beliefs they want to ignore.
John Paul II has reminded people who want the Catholic Church to change its stance on topics such as contraception that, unlike the JW's, the Church hasn't had "new light" and doesn't have the authority to arbitrarily change the rules every ten years. If people don't like the rules and choose to ignore them, that's their decision. The fact that JPII has remained staunch and faithful to the teachings of the church has earned him a lot of respect and admiration from people who admire integrity.
Regarding whether or not it's okay to trash someone who is dying and all the questions about who decides taste, one thing is certain: it's bad manners. Would you stand around at a wake and talk badly about the person in the casket? Of course not because it would be rude.